PropFirmoraMy Funded Futures vs Lucid Trading: Rapid and LucidFlex 50K
Both reviewed options are one-time and zero activation. Rapid uses an intraday funded floor; LucidFlex uses EOD timing in the selected configuration.
What replaces funded consistency?
Neither reviewed funded option has a best-day consistency test, but buffers, qualifying days and withdrawal fractions still restrict requests.
| Condition | My Funded FuturesRapid | Lucid TradingLucidFlex · DLL ON · 40% consistency |
|---|---|---|
| Exact configuration | Rapid | LucidFlex · DLL ON · 40% consistency |
| Evaluation entry fee | $125 · One-time | $80.50 · One-time |
| Activation | $0 | $0 |
| Evaluation target / loss distance | $3,000 / $2,000 | $3,000 / $2,000 |
| Evaluation floor | EOD trailing | EOD trailing |
| Evaluation consistency | 50% evaluation only | 40% for selected configuration; 50% add-on changes price |
| Funded floor | Intraday trailing | EOD trailing |
| Funded consistency | None | None |
| Access period | One-time evaluation; no monthly subscription | One-time evaluation; no monthly rebilling |
| Reset | Confirm with firm | $80 |
| Payout prerequisites | Eligible daily, first request at least 24 hours after first Sim Funded trade. Build $2,100 buffer; minimum request $500; 90% trader share. | Five qualifying profitable days per cycle and positive cycle net profit. Minimum $500; 50% of profit subject to size cap. No buffer. DLL ON adds intraday request capability with trading pause. |
| Unknowns / configuration limits | Help article states floor locks at +$100 when trailing reaches it. Product overview/FAQ describe lock timing differently; agreement must resolve that conflict. Evaluation reset price is not confirmed. | Official evaluation overview still says 50%; customization article and current selector specify 40% standard. Selected version is DLL ON / 40%; do not apply the two-day 50%-add-on claim to it. Payout caps and terms are in linked policy. |
One entry plus known activation
This hypothetical scenario assumes one evaluation entry, no reset and activation after passing. It excludes taxes, data, commissions and unconfirmed expenses. It is a known-fee subtotal, not a pass-cost estimate.
Which difference should drive the decision?
Neither reviewed funded option has a best-day consistency test, but buffers, qualifying days and withdrawal fractions still restrict requests. Review both exact configuration pages and their dated official evidence before purchasing.
The detail most easily missed
Rapid’s lock-threshold source conflict remains unresolved. The LucidFlex fee is for DLL ON.
Before choosing either
Confirm the current offer, your country eligibility, the agreement for the exact stage and the costs of another attempt. Neither a source check nor a side-by-side table establishes that a firm is financially safe. We have not purchased or traded these programs.
Separate evaluation and funded conditions · Read the first-payout checklist
Official evidence and unresolved details
My Funded Futures sources
Advertised promotional fee, with $209 shown as reference price. Promotion expiry and checkout eligibility not confirmed.
Help article states floor locks at +$100 when trailing reaches it. Product overview/FAQ describe lock timing differently; agreement must resolve that conflict. Evaluation reset price is not confirmed.
Lucid Trading sources
Interactive official selector, Flex tab, default DLL ON / 40%. Advertised 30% coupon price; homepage code VAULT. Checkout not tested.
Official evaluation overview still says 50%; customization article and current selector specify 40% standard. Selected version is DLL ON / 40%; do not apply the two-day 50%-add-on claim to it. Payout caps and terms are in linked policy.