Evidence over
endorsement.

Scope each fact

We identify the firm, named program, size, stage and add-ons before mapping a rule. Evaluation, simulated funded and live account terms remain separate. A firm-wide marketing claim does not automatically establish a program-specific condition.

Prefer primary sources

Official product pages, help centers and published policies supply program facts. Comparison sites may help discover a product, but their ratings, affiliate offers and summaries are not automatically adopted as evidence.

Keep uncertainty explicit

We retain source conflicts and leave unresolved conditions unconfirmed. We do not replace an unknown fee with zero or infer that a restriction is absent. Price checks and additional rule checks have distinct dates; a new page build is not a fresh price verification.

Explain the added value

We use calculations, stage comparisons and concrete examples to make rules understandable. Examples identify assumptions. We do not fabricate trading tests, payout receipts, user reviews, pass rates or expert credentials. AI tools support research and production; they do not establish the truth of a claim by themselves.

Correct and document

Send an official source to the correction channel. We assess its program scope, update affected facts where supported and retain a dated change note. We cannot promise instant review, and no automatic rule monitoring is currently claimed.

Commercial separation

Affiliate compensation must be disclosed near tracked links. Paid placement, if introduced, must be labeled. Compensation does not turn a firm into a “verified safe” recommendation and must not suppress unfavorable factual conditions.