PropFirmoraMy Funded Futures vs Tradeify: Rapid and Growth 50K
These selected one-time configurations both have zero activation, so the useful comparison moves to funded floor timing and payout constraints: Rapid is intraday; Growth is EOD with funded consistency.
What remains to compare when activation is zero on both?
The funded floor, consistency window, first-request prerequisites and reset terms still differ. Zero activation removes one charge, not the program’s operating constraints.
| Condition | My Funded FuturesRapid | TradeifyGrowth Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Exact configuration | Rapid | Growth Evaluation |
| Evaluation entry fee | $125 · One-time | $145 · One-time |
| Activation | $0 | $0 |
| Evaluation target / loss distance | $3,000 / $2,000 | $3,000 / $2,000 |
| Evaluation floor | EOD trailing | EOD trailing |
| Evaluation consistency | 50% evaluation only | None in evaluation; 35% belongs to funded stage |
| Funded floor | Intraday trailing | EOD trailing; locks at starting balance + $100 |
| Funded consistency | None | 35% |
| Access period | One-time evaluation; no monthly subscription | One-time; no recurring evaluation billing |
| Reset | Confirm with firm | $95 |
| Payout prerequisites | Eligible daily, first request at least 24 hours after first Sim Funded trade. Build $2,100 buffer; minimum request $500; 90% trader share. | Five days each above $150 profit per payout cycle; 35% funded consistency; minimum eligible balance $53,000. Minimum and maximum requests vary by size and payout number. |
| Unknowns / configuration limits | Help article states floor locks at +$100 when trailing reaches it. Product overview/FAQ describe lock timing differently; agreement must resolve that conflict. Evaluation reset price is not confirmed. | Homepage extraction contains placeholder targets and mismatched cards; help-center program tables used instead. Pricing overview mentions 35% without stage clarity; dedicated evaluation guide says none. |
One entry plus known activation
This hypothetical scenario assumes one evaluation entry, no reset and activation after passing. It excludes taxes, data, commissions and unconfirmed expenses. It is a known-fee subtotal, not a pass-cost estimate.
Which difference should drive the decision?
Choose the floor mechanics you can evaluate before treating the $20 entry-fee difference as decisive. Check Rapid’s retained source conflict on the lock threshold and Growth’s size-specific payout limits.
The detail most easily missed
MFFU’s Rapid 50K and Rapid EOD 25K are separate products. Do not substitute the EOD 25K rules into this Rapid 50K comparison.
Before choosing either
Confirm the current offer, your country eligibility, the agreement for the exact stage and the costs of another attempt. Neither a source check nor a side-by-side table establishes that a firm is financially safe. We have not purchased or traded these programs.
Separate evaluation and funded conditions · Read the first-payout checklist
Official evidence and unresolved details
My Funded Futures sources
Advertised promotional fee, with $209 shown as reference price. Promotion expiry and checkout eligibility not confirmed.
Help article states floor locks at +$100 when trailing reaches it. Product overview/FAQ describe lock timing differently; agreement must resolve that conflict. Evaluation reset price is not confirmed.
Tradeify sources
Official help-center list price; no homepage or third-party discount applied.
Homepage extraction contains placeholder targets and mismatched cards; help-center program tables used instead. Pricing overview mentions 35% without stage clarity; dedicated evaluation guide says none.